Essay, Research Paper: US Industrial Revolution
Economics
Free Economics research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page
was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of Economics, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
The Standard Oil Company founded by John D. Rockefeller and the U.S. Steel
Company founded by Andrew Carnegie. The Standard Oil Company and U.S. Steel
Company were made successful in different ways due to the actions of their
different owners. The companies differed in their labor relations, market
control, and structural organization. In the steel industry, Carnegie developed
a system known as vertical integration. This means that he cut out the middle
man. Carnegie bought his own iron and coal mines because using independent
companies cost too much and were inefficient. By doing this he was able to
undersell his competetors because they had to pay the competitors they went
through to get the raw materials. Unlike Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller
integrated his oil business from top to bottom, his distinctive innovation in
movement of American industry was horizontal. This meant he followed one product
through all its stages. For example, rockrfeller controlled the oil when it was
drilled, through the refining stage, and he maintained control over the refining
process turning it into gasoline. Although these two powerful men used two
different methods of management their businesses were still very successful (Conlin,
425-426). Tycoons like Andrew Carnegie, “the steel king,” and John D.
Rockefeller, “the oil baron,” exercised their genius in devising ways to
circument competition. Although, Carnegie inclined to be tough-fisted in
business, he was not a monopolist and disliked monopolistic trusts. John D.
Rockefeller came to dominate the oil industry. With one upward stride after
another he organized the Standard Oil Company, which was the nucleus of the
great trust that was formed. Rockefeller showed little mercy. He believed
primitive savagery prevailed in the jungle world of business, where only the
fittest survived. He persued the policy of “ruin or rule.” Rockefeller’s
oil monopoly did turn out a superior product at a relatively cheap price.
Rockefeller belived in ruthless business, Carnegie didn’t, yet they both had
the most successful companies in their industries. (The American Pageant, pages
515-518) Rockefeller treated his customers in the same manner that Andrew
Carnegie treated his workers: cruel and harsh. The Standard Oil Company
desperately wanted every possible company to buy their products. Standard Oil
used ruthless tactics when Rockefeller threatenedto start his own chain of
grocery stores and put local merchants out of business if they did not buy oil
from Standard Oil Company. Carnegie dealt with his workers with the same cold
lack of diplomacy and consideration. Carnegie would encourage an unfriendly
competition between two of his workers and he goaded them into outdoing one
another. Some of his employees found working under Carnegie unbearable. These
rivalries became so important to the employees that somedidn’t talk to each
other for years (McCloskkey, page 145). Although both Carnegie and Rockefeller
created extermely successsful companies, they both used unscrupulous methods in
some aspect of their corporation building to get to the top. The success of the
Standard Oil Company and U.S. Steel company was credited to the fact that their
owners ran them with great authority. In this very competetive time period, many
new businesses were being formed and it took talented businessmen to get ahead
and keep the companies running and make the fortunes that were made during this
period.
Company founded by Andrew Carnegie. The Standard Oil Company and U.S. Steel
Company were made successful in different ways due to the actions of their
different owners. The companies differed in their labor relations, market
control, and structural organization. In the steel industry, Carnegie developed
a system known as vertical integration. This means that he cut out the middle
man. Carnegie bought his own iron and coal mines because using independent
companies cost too much and were inefficient. By doing this he was able to
undersell his competetors because they had to pay the competitors they went
through to get the raw materials. Unlike Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller
integrated his oil business from top to bottom, his distinctive innovation in
movement of American industry was horizontal. This meant he followed one product
through all its stages. For example, rockrfeller controlled the oil when it was
drilled, through the refining stage, and he maintained control over the refining
process turning it into gasoline. Although these two powerful men used two
different methods of management their businesses were still very successful (Conlin,
425-426). Tycoons like Andrew Carnegie, “the steel king,” and John D.
Rockefeller, “the oil baron,” exercised their genius in devising ways to
circument competition. Although, Carnegie inclined to be tough-fisted in
business, he was not a monopolist and disliked monopolistic trusts. John D.
Rockefeller came to dominate the oil industry. With one upward stride after
another he organized the Standard Oil Company, which was the nucleus of the
great trust that was formed. Rockefeller showed little mercy. He believed
primitive savagery prevailed in the jungle world of business, where only the
fittest survived. He persued the policy of “ruin or rule.” Rockefeller’s
oil monopoly did turn out a superior product at a relatively cheap price.
Rockefeller belived in ruthless business, Carnegie didn’t, yet they both had
the most successful companies in their industries. (The American Pageant, pages
515-518) Rockefeller treated his customers in the same manner that Andrew
Carnegie treated his workers: cruel and harsh. The Standard Oil Company
desperately wanted every possible company to buy their products. Standard Oil
used ruthless tactics when Rockefeller threatenedto start his own chain of
grocery stores and put local merchants out of business if they did not buy oil
from Standard Oil Company. Carnegie dealt with his workers with the same cold
lack of diplomacy and consideration. Carnegie would encourage an unfriendly
competition between two of his workers and he goaded them into outdoing one
another. Some of his employees found working under Carnegie unbearable. These
rivalries became so important to the employees that somedidn’t talk to each
other for years (McCloskkey, page 145). Although both Carnegie and Rockefeller
created extermely successsful companies, they both used unscrupulous methods in
some aspect of their corporation building to get to the top. The success of the
Standard Oil Company and U.S. Steel company was credited to the fact that their
owners ran them with great authority. In this very competetive time period, many
new businesses were being formed and it took talented businessmen to get ahead
and keep the companies running and make the fortunes that were made during this
period.
0
0
Good or bad? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Get a Custom Paper on Economics:
Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on Economics: , we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.
Related essays:
0
0
Economics / US National Debt
The U.S. National Debt "Spending financed not by current tax receipts, but
by borrowing or drawing upon past tax reserves." Is it a good idea? Why
does the U.S. run a deficit? Since 1980 the...
0
1
Economics / US Tradeport
After going to the Tradeport website, I have decided to do my paper on a US
federal government agency. I explored a few of the agencies and decided to
choose the US Trade and Development Agency. The U...
0
0
Economics / Values Of Americans
America is the most powerful country in the world. The American economy has been
a symbol of the wealth of a nation. The efforts of our forefathers and present
geniuses have created economic values, w...
0
0
Economics / Venezuela`s Economy
Venezuela is rich in oil and other mineral resources. Its per capita income is
about average for Latin America. The country's public external debt (excluding
the obligations of the central bank and PD...
0
0
Economics / Virginia Unemployment
The economic situation differs from country to country, caused by difference in
population, geography, monetary system, political situation and a lot of other
factors. But even within one country ther...