Essay, Research Paper: Godfather
English
Free English research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page
was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of English, use the professional writing service offered by our company.
The Book and the movie of The Godfather have their similarities and differences
that I will be focusing on. The Godfather is the best selling phenomenon - a
classic of our time. The Godfather story was written before the movie came out
approximately 30 years ago. At first glance, the book and the movie appear the
same. Upon further investigation, however, the two forms of media do possess
certain differences. Although they are different in the areas of characters,
setting, and dialog, they are similar in the areas of violence, Don Vito
Corleone, and Michael Corleone. These differences in the movie and the book are
very minute. The plot for both were intense to read and watch. Gangster action
is my forte. There seems to be nothing better than acknowledging a character
that plays a role that is highly respected and feared. The plot was very
interesting and easy to follow. The literature to this book as opposed to The
Rainmaker is that Mario Puzo is better at describing a setting vividly to get a
good mental picture as to what is going on. The characters in both the movie and
book are easy to relate to because of the Italian side of my family. Whenever we
have family get togethers and our "Mafia" picnic, I see the same
socializing/ conduct that happens in the story/film. There is one single person
that is in my family that is assumed to be the Godfather. I guess I can say that
is because my parents strongly urged that I foreclose myself from talking about
it to the other people in the family. Acting in the movie including Marlon
Brando (Don Vito Corleone), Al Pacino (Michael Corleone), Robert Duvall (Tom
Hagen) and Diane Keaton (Kay Adams) all had contributed to a great life-like
effort. With those mentioned and along with a handful of others was their acting
debut. The only thing I feel was not well thought out about the movie is the
characters picked out to play the parts. Some of them were not considered to
look like they were Italian. Along with that the sons of the Godfather did not
resemble each other, the father, nor the mother. The setting in both the movie
and the book were accurate. A lot of the Italian families that just got off the
boat resided in New York. The reason for that is because it was the direct route
from here to Europe. The dialog throughout the film/book was not that of the
native Italian language. The story was in a sense, wasAmericanized. The Italian
names were there and the Italian culture was there, but the dialog was in
English for the most part. The dialog in the story was done in a hierarchical
structure; the most important of people were spoken to accordingly. The main
focus in this paper is to discuss the differences between the novel and the
film. I would like to reiterate that the characters, setting, and dialog are all
topics of interests that are different. Opposite to that the violence, Don Vito
Corleone, and Michael Corleone are similar in both mediums. With those six main
differences/similarities I will provide four supporting occurrences for each
topic. The characters in the book were more put into detail. The ones to be
mentioned that were not in the movie may not reflect that they might have had a
one second part that could easily be passed up. The characters that were not
included on the movie but not in the book are Nazorine, Margot Ashton, Enzo,
Katherine, Filomena, Anthony Cappola, and Billy Goff. Of course there are more
to be added to the list, but I am simply making a statement. The idea of listing
and describing all of them would be tedious. Nazorine is a baker that is
described as a pudgy and crusty as his great Italian loaves, still dusty with
flour that scowled at his wife. Katherine is Nazorine's daughter. Enzo was
Nazorine's baker helper. Filomena is the one that Nazorine scowled at his wife.
Margot Ashton, along with being Johnny Fontaine's wife, was described as a
beautiful woman with an angelic face, soulful violet eyes, and delicately
fragile but perfectly formed body. Anthony Coppola was a son of a man Don
Corleone had worked with on the railroad yards in his youth. Billy Goff was the
most powerful man in the movie labor unions. All in all the book is more likely
to describe in detail about the characters. The scene where Genco Abbandando has
cancer and is visited by Don, Johnny, Sunny, Tom, Michael, and as well as others
in the hospital is also excluded in the movie. Three days later Genco Abbandando
dies. The book started out with Amerigo Bonasera in New York Criminal Court
Number 3 for a case involving his daughter. The case was based on vengeance on
the men who had cruelly hurt his daughter. After thinking about why the book
started out with the case and its significance, I didn't find any evidence in
its connection with the book. The case was not included in the movie, which
comes to my second difference between the literature and the film. Other setting
that differs from the film is that the book lacked mentioning of Don Vito
Corleone's wife. In general, I feel that women were not important to the
characters and the outcome of the story. Still the theory of women not having
rights holds to be true with Mario Puzo's work. Mary Kay was really the only
female character in the novel that has much bearing as to what goes on. If I
were the one to write the novel I would have stressed more women roles. Could
there be any conflictions with the wives of the male characters as to how and
why they killed other people? Those type of issues were not addressed in the
book that could be very likely to happen in those type of situations. Paulie
Gatto was on the Godfather's hit list now. Paulie Gatto was one of the
Godfather's caporegimes (bodyguard) and was being replaced by Rocco Lampone.
Rocco Lampone worked for the Godfather as an internship for a little while. The
scene consisted of Clemenza, Rocco Lampone, and Paulie Gatto. The Godfather
found out that Paulie Gatto was getting paid by Sollazo and didn't want an
unfaithful man as his bodyguard. The difference lies in that Clemenza made a
stop to eat at an Italian restaurant before killing Paulie. The book has its
differences with the dialog from the movie. The first reference to that is when
the book basically states that the laws don't work for justification purposes,
but the Mafia does. The Mario Puzo uses a couple of words that are not used in
the movie, for one being caporegime. As mentioned before, a caporegime is any of
the bodyguards of Don Vito Corleone. My assumptions are that it is an Italian
word. Another word used in the book, but not in the film is pezzonovante.
Pezzonovante is a word that means gun. Just like caporegime, it is also an
Italian word. The time in Michael Corleone's life after he shot Solazzo and
Captain McCluskey where he is hiding from the police presents another difference
in dialog. While being in Italy, there is some conversation in the movie where
others are speaking in Italian. The book is strictly written in English so the
Americans can understand it. The Godfather written by Mario Puzo and the film
directed by Francis Ford Coppola have more similarities than differences. The
similarities can't all be pointed out, however some can be brought out. The main
topics of interest for similarities are violence, Don Vito Corleone, and Michael
Corleone. The way that Jack Woltz's horse, Paulie Gatto, Sonny Corleone, and
Luca Brasi were killed in the same fashion from the movie to the book. Jack
Woltz's horse Khartoum is a retired bred that was purchased for six hundred
thousand dollars. The reason the horse came about was because Tom Hagan was
there to visit/request that Johnny Fontaine get the part for the next movie.
Being that Jack Woltz was the most powerful man in the movie industry, he could
be very resourceful for Johnny Fontaine to become famous. Jack Woltz denied the
grant for Johnny's part in the movie so Don Vito Corleone had Jack's most
precious thing killed. Jack Woltz could only wish that his horse be more head
strung. Paulie Gatto was killed like mentioned before; the simple fact that he
was being paid off by ( Solazzo ) one of the Godfather's enemies. Rocco and
Clemenza took Paulie to a field and killed him where Clemenza supposedly had to
go to the bathroom. Sonny Corleone ( Santino ) was killed and set up after
Connie Corleone and Carlo Rizzi got into a fight. Sonny when finding out that
Carlo Rizzi had hit Connie, he went to go after him. There was prior animosity
between Carlo and Sonny because Sonny had beat the heck out of him for hitting
his sister before. Sonny on his way to get Carlo, he was blocked in to a
security gate and shot at. Luca Brasi, one that was feared by all but only
feared the Godfather, got erased by Tattalia and Solazzo. Luca Brasi was brought
to a meeting with Tattalia and Solazzo to be offered a more generous dividend
for his efforts. The two thought that such a brute force on their side would be
a benefit to them. Luca Brasi's life ended when they had strangled him to death.
Don Vito Corleone, the Godfather of the Corleone family, reflected the same
person in both forms of the story. "Don Vito Corleone was a man to whom
everybody came for help, and never were they disappointed.", verbatim from
the book. Words of "I'll give them an offer that cannot refuse" were
mearly a reference to a part of his personality. He made no empty promises, for
he didn't let anyone down. Don Corleone would take other people's problems to
heart. The things that he did for people were looked at as a favor. He didn't
look for pay out of a deal, at least not directly. Don Vito Corleone believed in
the theory that you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. Between the two ( book
and the movie ) there was a happy medium in how the Godfather was shot by
Solazzo and others not mentioned. Solazzo shot the Godfather because he did not
want the family to do anything with dealing drugs. Solazzo being pro drugs,
thought he could get his way if he killed the Don. Michael Corleone was the
youngest son of Don Corleone and the only child who had refused the Godfather's
direction with the business. The description of the physical appearance matched
that of the book. The literature and the film were also both synomous with
Michael Corleone in regards to his personality, how he killed Solazzo, how he
killed Captain McCluskey, and how he became the Don. In summation of the book
and the film, I feel that each has their entities. The vivid descriptions that
Mario Puzo uses to effect the readers' minds could not brought to life without
Francis Ford Coppola's film version. Reading the book was sincerely my first
positive experience I have ever had with reading a book. Honestly, I have opened
myself for the first time to reading books. That is why I am happy that the book
and the novel are so closely related. I liked the book more because I will
always look back at it. To sum it all up the differences are certain specifics
of the characters, setting, and dialog. The similarities consist of violence,
Don Vito Corleone, and Michael Corleone.
that I will be focusing on. The Godfather is the best selling phenomenon - a
classic of our time. The Godfather story was written before the movie came out
approximately 30 years ago. At first glance, the book and the movie appear the
same. Upon further investigation, however, the two forms of media do possess
certain differences. Although they are different in the areas of characters,
setting, and dialog, they are similar in the areas of violence, Don Vito
Corleone, and Michael Corleone. These differences in the movie and the book are
very minute. The plot for both were intense to read and watch. Gangster action
is my forte. There seems to be nothing better than acknowledging a character
that plays a role that is highly respected and feared. The plot was very
interesting and easy to follow. The literature to this book as opposed to The
Rainmaker is that Mario Puzo is better at describing a setting vividly to get a
good mental picture as to what is going on. The characters in both the movie and
book are easy to relate to because of the Italian side of my family. Whenever we
have family get togethers and our "Mafia" picnic, I see the same
socializing/ conduct that happens in the story/film. There is one single person
that is in my family that is assumed to be the Godfather. I guess I can say that
is because my parents strongly urged that I foreclose myself from talking about
it to the other people in the family. Acting in the movie including Marlon
Brando (Don Vito Corleone), Al Pacino (Michael Corleone), Robert Duvall (Tom
Hagen) and Diane Keaton (Kay Adams) all had contributed to a great life-like
effort. With those mentioned and along with a handful of others was their acting
debut. The only thing I feel was not well thought out about the movie is the
characters picked out to play the parts. Some of them were not considered to
look like they were Italian. Along with that the sons of the Godfather did not
resemble each other, the father, nor the mother. The setting in both the movie
and the book were accurate. A lot of the Italian families that just got off the
boat resided in New York. The reason for that is because it was the direct route
from here to Europe. The dialog throughout the film/book was not that of the
native Italian language. The story was in a sense, wasAmericanized. The Italian
names were there and the Italian culture was there, but the dialog was in
English for the most part. The dialog in the story was done in a hierarchical
structure; the most important of people were spoken to accordingly. The main
focus in this paper is to discuss the differences between the novel and the
film. I would like to reiterate that the characters, setting, and dialog are all
topics of interests that are different. Opposite to that the violence, Don Vito
Corleone, and Michael Corleone are similar in both mediums. With those six main
differences/similarities I will provide four supporting occurrences for each
topic. The characters in the book were more put into detail. The ones to be
mentioned that were not in the movie may not reflect that they might have had a
one second part that could easily be passed up. The characters that were not
included on the movie but not in the book are Nazorine, Margot Ashton, Enzo,
Katherine, Filomena, Anthony Cappola, and Billy Goff. Of course there are more
to be added to the list, but I am simply making a statement. The idea of listing
and describing all of them would be tedious. Nazorine is a baker that is
described as a pudgy and crusty as his great Italian loaves, still dusty with
flour that scowled at his wife. Katherine is Nazorine's daughter. Enzo was
Nazorine's baker helper. Filomena is the one that Nazorine scowled at his wife.
Margot Ashton, along with being Johnny Fontaine's wife, was described as a
beautiful woman with an angelic face, soulful violet eyes, and delicately
fragile but perfectly formed body. Anthony Coppola was a son of a man Don
Corleone had worked with on the railroad yards in his youth. Billy Goff was the
most powerful man in the movie labor unions. All in all the book is more likely
to describe in detail about the characters. The scene where Genco Abbandando has
cancer and is visited by Don, Johnny, Sunny, Tom, Michael, and as well as others
in the hospital is also excluded in the movie. Three days later Genco Abbandando
dies. The book started out with Amerigo Bonasera in New York Criminal Court
Number 3 for a case involving his daughter. The case was based on vengeance on
the men who had cruelly hurt his daughter. After thinking about why the book
started out with the case and its significance, I didn't find any evidence in
its connection with the book. The case was not included in the movie, which
comes to my second difference between the literature and the film. Other setting
that differs from the film is that the book lacked mentioning of Don Vito
Corleone's wife. In general, I feel that women were not important to the
characters and the outcome of the story. Still the theory of women not having
rights holds to be true with Mario Puzo's work. Mary Kay was really the only
female character in the novel that has much bearing as to what goes on. If I
were the one to write the novel I would have stressed more women roles. Could
there be any conflictions with the wives of the male characters as to how and
why they killed other people? Those type of issues were not addressed in the
book that could be very likely to happen in those type of situations. Paulie
Gatto was on the Godfather's hit list now. Paulie Gatto was one of the
Godfather's caporegimes (bodyguard) and was being replaced by Rocco Lampone.
Rocco Lampone worked for the Godfather as an internship for a little while. The
scene consisted of Clemenza, Rocco Lampone, and Paulie Gatto. The Godfather
found out that Paulie Gatto was getting paid by Sollazo and didn't want an
unfaithful man as his bodyguard. The difference lies in that Clemenza made a
stop to eat at an Italian restaurant before killing Paulie. The book has its
differences with the dialog from the movie. The first reference to that is when
the book basically states that the laws don't work for justification purposes,
but the Mafia does. The Mario Puzo uses a couple of words that are not used in
the movie, for one being caporegime. As mentioned before, a caporegime is any of
the bodyguards of Don Vito Corleone. My assumptions are that it is an Italian
word. Another word used in the book, but not in the film is pezzonovante.
Pezzonovante is a word that means gun. Just like caporegime, it is also an
Italian word. The time in Michael Corleone's life after he shot Solazzo and
Captain McCluskey where he is hiding from the police presents another difference
in dialog. While being in Italy, there is some conversation in the movie where
others are speaking in Italian. The book is strictly written in English so the
Americans can understand it. The Godfather written by Mario Puzo and the film
directed by Francis Ford Coppola have more similarities than differences. The
similarities can't all be pointed out, however some can be brought out. The main
topics of interest for similarities are violence, Don Vito Corleone, and Michael
Corleone. The way that Jack Woltz's horse, Paulie Gatto, Sonny Corleone, and
Luca Brasi were killed in the same fashion from the movie to the book. Jack
Woltz's horse Khartoum is a retired bred that was purchased for six hundred
thousand dollars. The reason the horse came about was because Tom Hagan was
there to visit/request that Johnny Fontaine get the part for the next movie.
Being that Jack Woltz was the most powerful man in the movie industry, he could
be very resourceful for Johnny Fontaine to become famous. Jack Woltz denied the
grant for Johnny's part in the movie so Don Vito Corleone had Jack's most
precious thing killed. Jack Woltz could only wish that his horse be more head
strung. Paulie Gatto was killed like mentioned before; the simple fact that he
was being paid off by ( Solazzo ) one of the Godfather's enemies. Rocco and
Clemenza took Paulie to a field and killed him where Clemenza supposedly had to
go to the bathroom. Sonny Corleone ( Santino ) was killed and set up after
Connie Corleone and Carlo Rizzi got into a fight. Sonny when finding out that
Carlo Rizzi had hit Connie, he went to go after him. There was prior animosity
between Carlo and Sonny because Sonny had beat the heck out of him for hitting
his sister before. Sonny on his way to get Carlo, he was blocked in to a
security gate and shot at. Luca Brasi, one that was feared by all but only
feared the Godfather, got erased by Tattalia and Solazzo. Luca Brasi was brought
to a meeting with Tattalia and Solazzo to be offered a more generous dividend
for his efforts. The two thought that such a brute force on their side would be
a benefit to them. Luca Brasi's life ended when they had strangled him to death.
Don Vito Corleone, the Godfather of the Corleone family, reflected the same
person in both forms of the story. "Don Vito Corleone was a man to whom
everybody came for help, and never were they disappointed.", verbatim from
the book. Words of "I'll give them an offer that cannot refuse" were
mearly a reference to a part of his personality. He made no empty promises, for
he didn't let anyone down. Don Corleone would take other people's problems to
heart. The things that he did for people were looked at as a favor. He didn't
look for pay out of a deal, at least not directly. Don Vito Corleone believed in
the theory that you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. Between the two ( book
and the movie ) there was a happy medium in how the Godfather was shot by
Solazzo and others not mentioned. Solazzo shot the Godfather because he did not
want the family to do anything with dealing drugs. Solazzo being pro drugs,
thought he could get his way if he killed the Don. Michael Corleone was the
youngest son of Don Corleone and the only child who had refused the Godfather's
direction with the business. The description of the physical appearance matched
that of the book. The literature and the film were also both synomous with
Michael Corleone in regards to his personality, how he killed Solazzo, how he
killed Captain McCluskey, and how he became the Don. In summation of the book
and the film, I feel that each has their entities. The vivid descriptions that
Mario Puzo uses to effect the readers' minds could not brought to life without
Francis Ford Coppola's film version. Reading the book was sincerely my first
positive experience I have ever had with reading a book. Honestly, I have opened
myself for the first time to reading books. That is why I am happy that the book
and the novel are so closely related. I liked the book more because I will
always look back at it. To sum it all up the differences are certain specifics
of the characters, setting, and dialog. The similarities consist of violence,
Don Vito Corleone, and Michael Corleone.
0
0
Good or bad? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Get a Custom Paper on English:
Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on English: , we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.
Related essays:
1
0
English / Gone With The Wind By Mitchell
The novel being summarized is titled Gone with the Wind, written by Margaret
Mitchell. It was published in 1936, after it took her seven years to write, and
won a Pulitzer Prize in 1937. Gone with the...
0
0
English / Good Earth By Pearl Buck
A simple, hardworking Chinese farmer is all he is. But there is more to this
simple farmer, he is not just a common character in this book, but a universal
figure, an example of people that have till...
1
1
English / Good Father
The definition of a good father is as individual as the individuals involved
themselves. A good father is able to support his children’s strengths, along
with being able to help them overcome their we...
0
0
English / Grass Soup And Food Division
Barbara Jones Food Division Zhang's attitude towards splitting up food rations
at the reform camp suggests he has not been completely broken down and reformed
by The Party. The significance of the div...
0
1
English / Green Mile By King
Stephen King wrote The Green Mile. The Green Mile comes in either the series or
one big book. There are six books in the series. The names are 1. The two dead
girls. 2. The mouse on the mile. 3. Coffe...