Essay, Research Paper: Kant And Utilitarianism

Philosophy

Free Philosophy research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of Philosophy, use the professional writing service offered by our company.


First of all I want to state the Kantian and the Utilitarian views butt heads on
this issue. The Kantian view is nonconsequential, that is as a matter of
principle with the consequences be damned. The Utilitarian view is consequential
with the results given as much consideration as possible. I will attempt to
explain what I mean through some examples. Some school systems hand out condoms
free of charge to their students. The Utilitarian view would be that this is a
good thing. They would state that by doing so they are stopping unwanted
pregnancies that in turn could cost society. This program would help stop the
spreading of diseases such as HIV, AIDS and syphilis. This also would lesson the
burden on society. Kantian view would not be in favor of this program because it
is considering the outcome of what might happen if the program were not in
place. They might feel it is the parent’s decision to make because it is their
job to act in good will of their family and not the school system’s. Another
topic under much debate would be assisted suicide. The Kantian view is totally
opposed to this. It is just wrong to kill someone. One cannot kill another
person out of good will. If you were to apply this to the Universal Law it would
not hold true and there for it is wrong. On the other hand, the Utilitarian view
would be open to this concept. How could we allow one to suffer knowing they are
going to die in the end anyway? Would it be wrong to stop the suffering? How can
one seek the greatest amount of happiness if they are suffering and are
basically condemned to die? By assisting this individual we are also helping out
his family by limiting their grief. We are also helping out society by freeing
up a bed in the hospital for those individuals that could be healed and go on to
lead a happy life. It could also save money if the person does not have
insurance. The last example I want to use is the needle exchange program. This
is where drug users can exchange dirty needles for clean ones. This program also
stops the spreading of diseases such as HIV and AIDS. The Utilitarian would also
state that is lessons the burden on society. Drug users are also associated to
crime and when they come into exchange needles help may be provided to get them
off drugs and there fore lesson the crime rate and bring more happiness to
society. The Kantian view would not be in favor of this program because it is
considering the consequences of what would happen if community doesn’t help.
They would state that drug use is not good will and not at all duty. If a drug
user is breaking the law by using drugs and needles they should be punished.
This punishment is not to be a deterrent but rather what is right because one
breaks the law. I Think the Utilitarian view is better than the Kantian view
because it does consider the outcomes of the event. Though I am not wholly sold
on their concept. The Kantian view does not address the problem it just condemns
it. In the world today we all know what happens when a person breaks the law and
so do the criminals yet; they still break the law. When someone is addicted to a
drug it is out of their control to help themselves and society as a whole should
step in and help. Their does come a time when you can help only so much and it
is up to the individual to correct their own wrong but not in all circumstances.
I think the best approach would be a happy medium between both views.
1
0
Good or bad? How would you rate this essay?
Help other users to find the good and worthy free term papers and trash the bad ones.
Like this term paper? Vote & Promote so that others can find it

Get a Custom Paper on Philosophy:

Free papers will not meet the guidelines of your specific project. If you need a custom essay on Philosophy: , we can write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written papers will pass any plagiarism test, guaranteed. Our writing service will save you time and grade.




Related essays:

0
0
In the story, The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas, two points of view are introduced. The Kantian point of view is contrasted with the Utilitarian point of view. In the story there is a city named Ome...
2777 views
0 comments
2
0
Philosophy / Kant On Ethics
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) had an interesting ethical system for reasoning. It is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. In Kant’s eyes reason is directly correlated wi...
2994 views
0 comments
0
0
Philosophy / Kant`s Morality
Kant starts off making two distinctions regarding kinds of knowledge, empirical/rational and formal/material. Empirical or experience-based knowledge is contrasted with rational knowledge, which is i...
3210 views
0 comments
1
0
Philosophy / Karl Marx
Karl Marx wrote many works throughout his time, but one of the works of his youth was called On Man and History. This work by Marx was written when he was a youth and was influenced by the Industrial...
3298 views
0 comments
0
0
Philosophy / Kelvin
“Thomson’s view on the recent age of the world have been for some time one of my sorest troubles, (pg. 107)” This quote is used to collaborate the author’s idea that Darwin was deeply opposed to Kelv...
2356 views
0 comments